aldcor
8 November 2023 20:16
1
I’ve probably never had such a fast boot up time on this old laptop. I was using voidlinux for 4 years and then alpine linux for a 2 months and I thought boot up time is quite good but for some unknown reason (to me) Garuda is even faster… It could only be 3 or 4 secs faster, but still
Share an output of systemd-analyze, and your PC specs. I’m curious.
Startup finished in 3.316s (kernel) + 786ms (initrd) + 3.207s (userspace) = 7.311s graphical.target reached after 2.314s in userspace.
I bought this laptop in 2014 (or 2015):
3 Likes
V01D
8 November 2023 20:46
2
wow, 3 seconds is fast as hell
Startup finished in 7.630s (firmware) + 7.622s (loader) + 1.164s (kernel) + 2.927s (initrd) + 2.296s (userspac
e) = 21.640s
graphical.target reached after 2.295s in userspace.
Got the MSI Katana 15 B12V
Have you tweaked the system or how the heck does your system boots that fast tho
4 Likes
Startup finished in 6.375s (firmware) + 7.101s (loader) + 1.281s (kernel) + 4.241s (initrd) + 23.083s (userspace) = 42.084s
Lenovo Ideapad 320 CPU : AMD E2-9000 Radeon R2 (2016 I think…)RAM : 8GBGPU : AMD Radeon R2DE : GNOME (Almost fresh) Dual boot with KDEKERNEL : Linux Bore
Not that my system is something to boast about (I was not even gonna post) but damn, I expected much worse…
2 Likes
SGS
8 November 2023 22:30
5
systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 3.411s (firmware) + 10.241s (loader) + 544ms (kernel) + 2.129s (initrd) + 2.639s (userspace) = 18.966s
graphical.target reached after 2.639s in userspace.
Hyprland
2 Likes
Yep, even I assume Hyprland will take only 5s startup time on mine because it’s so light…
1 Like
aldcor
8 November 2023 23:00
7
I have changed from hdd to ssd, so I guess I have tweaked a system. I’m surprised myself about boot speed, however, this is a fresh install and I have only installed extra Garuda wallpapers so, there is no extra read-time I assume. Using sway-wm also helps I assume. You are using ssd as well, right?
4 Likes
Gquirt
9 November 2023 00:15
8
Startup finished in 2.565s (kernel) + 4.456s (initrd) + 4.601s (userspace) = 11.623s
graphical.target reached after 4.601s in userspace.
My system:
This has me winning by 0.041 seconds
4 Likes
Startup finished in 3.494s (firmware) + 4.242s (loader) + 826ms (kernel) + 3.625s (initrd) + 2.426s (userspace) = 14.614s
graphical.target reached after 2.129s in userspace.
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (16) @ 4.46 GHz
5 Likes
❯ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 13.748s (firmware) + 7.258s (loader) + 5.515s (kernel) + 8.197s (userspace) = 34.720s
graphical.target reached after 8.197s in userspace.
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K (8) @ 3.90 GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Memory: 3.50 GiB / 23.42 GiB
Kernel: 6.6.1-zen1-1-zen
not bad for 15 year old hardware lmao >.>
Edit:
Startup finished in 7.992s (firmware) + 3.518s (loader) + 4.924s (kernel) + 5.388s (userspace) = 21.825s
graphical.target reached after 5.388s in userspace.
Edit 2:
4 Likes
aldcor
9 November 2023 10:27
11
Wow! 23.4GiB memory?! What are you trying to remember?
1 Like
i’d tell you if i could >.>
Wow!!! you lot I need a new pc
λ systemd-analyze
CPU: 13th Gen Intel i9-13900K (32) @ 5.8GHz
4 Likes
NaN
9 November 2023 15:23
15
How can I miss the chance to showoff my fastfetch
6 Likes
aldcor
9 November 2023 16:38
17
Oh, yes, that’s very pretty. I thought it’s default of Garuda KDE version and if it’s not, it should be
1 Like
wtf lol my 12 year old ‘potato’ is faster than yours?
lulz >.>
1 Like
NaN
9 November 2023 16:55
19
TilliDie:
I need a new pc
Says the one with most bleeding edge overpowered pc here… (Atleast out of those who have posted).
3 Likes
and mine is ‘ancient’ and statistically speaking the most efficient so far lmao
i’m itching to build a new one with modern components and see what i can do, but i’m too poor these days to drop 10k on a new rig.
1 Like
