drwxr-xr-x - root 2 Jan 16:58 browser
drwxr-xr-x - root 1 Jan 13:19 defaults
drwxr-xr-x - root 2 Jan 16:58 distribution
drwxr-xr-x - root 2 Jan 16:58 fonts
drwxr-xr-x - root 1 Jan 13:19 gmp-clearkey
lrwxrwxrwx - root 30 Oct 2023 native-messaging-hosts -> /usr/lib/mozilla/native-messaging-hosts
.rw-r--r-- 505 root 30 Oct 2023 application.ini
.rw-r--r-- 104 root 30 Oct 2023 dependentlibs.list
.rwxr-xr-x 651k root 30 Oct 2023 firedragon
lrwxrwxrwx - root 30 Oct 2023 firedragon-bin -> ../../bin/firedragon
.rwxr-xr-x 28k root 30 Oct 2023 firedragon.cfg
.rw-r--r-- 2.3k root 30 Oct 2023 firedragon.overrides.cfg
.rw-r--r-- 282 root 30 Oct 2023 firejail-fix.hook
.rwxr-xr-x 19k root 30 Oct 2023 glxtest
.rwxr-xr-x 500k root 30 Oct 2023 libgkcodecs.so
.rwxr-xr-x 383k root 30 Oct 2023 libipcclientcerts.so
.rwxr-xr-x 31k root 30 Oct 2023 liblgpllibs.so
.rwxr-xr-x 3.9M root 30 Oct 2023 libmozavcodec.so
.rwxr-xr-x 236k root 30 Oct 2023 libmozavutil.so
.rwxr-xr-x 4.1k root 30 Oct 2023 libmozgtk.so
.rwxr-xr-x 122k root 30 Oct 2023 libmozsandbox.so
.rwxr-xr-x 1.2M root 30 Oct 2023 libmozsqlite3.so
.rwxr-xr-x 10k root 30 Oct 2023 libmozwayland.so
.rwxr-xr-x 146M root 30 Oct 2023 libxul.so
.rw-r--r-- 32M root 30 Oct 2023 omni.ja
.rw-r--r-- 100 root 30 Oct 2023 platform.ini
.rw-r--r-- 3.2k root 30 Oct 2023 README.md
.rw-r--r-- 0 root 30 Oct 2023 removed-files
.rwxr-xr-x 13k root 30 Oct 2023 vaapitest
That definitely is the issue. Should not be as far back as Oct.
The file you got is also 9kb too small, so really not the one to use here.
Now what does
paru -Qi firedragon
say?
That color is way too light, but --in-content-page-color
seems very very very close, so I will give that one a try. Tnx for pointing out the file!
I have actually two or 3 times reinstalled the thing so…
╭─ankur@ankur in ~ as 🧙 took 26s
╰─λ paru -Qi firedragon
Installed From : None
Name : firedragon
Version : 11.7.1-10
Description : Floorp fork build using custom branding & settings
Architecture : x86_64
URL : http://dr460nf1r3.org
Licenses : MPL2
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : dbus dbus-glib ffmpeg gtk3 libevent libjpeg libpulse libvpx libwebp libxss libxt mime-types nss pipewire ttf-font zlib
Optional Deps : hunspell-dictionary: Spell checking
libnotify: Notification integration [installed]
networkmanager: Location detection via available WiFi networks [installed]
profile-sync-daemon: Load the browser profile into RAM [installed]
pulseaudio: Audio support [installed]
searx: Searching the web using a locally running searX instance
speech-dispatcher: Text-to-Speech
whoogle: Searching the web using a locally running Whoogle instance
xdg-desktop-portal: Screensharing with Wayland [installed]
Required By : None
Optional For : None
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Installed Size : 263.00 MiB
Packager : Garuda Builder <[email protected]>
Build Date : Sunday 31 December 2023 06:11:08 PM
Install Date : Tuesday 02 January 2024 08:46:29 PM
Install Reason : Explicitly installed
Install Script : No
Validated By : None
╭─ankur@ankur in ~ as 🧙 took 685ms
╰─λ
Is it possible Hyprland installs packages differently?
Every file dated Oct 30 should be dated Dec 31 at the minimum, including firedragon itself, but you show version 11.7.1, which is mind-boggling.
What terminal command did you input to install the package?
Hm, I though it was about the background color?
Anyways, I see it’s set also in chrome://global/skin/in-content/common-shared.css
and perhaps other places.
That may explain why I could not override it in userChrome.css (I checked that toolkit.legacyUserProfileCustomizations.stylesheets
is true).
Gotta RTFM some more.
Do you know if there are variables set dynamically to the theme colors?
#20242c
looks nice with the Nord colors but it’s still hardcoded, back to square one.
It is. Except color #f7f7f7 is way too light.
I did find just now that --in-content-page-background
is found elsewhere in the file and uses color #333333 (or #333 in some place) and THAT is the exact color.
So correct option, just not under the right section that I was.
Yes I had the same issue, which is why I posted the question about this I was then pretty sure it was hard coded somewhere. And I think you find out where!
You can change most of those changed by Firefox Themes.
And then just a couple through userChrome, like:
.tab-close-button
.tab-close-button:hover
@media not (prefers-contrast)
.close-icon:hover
#tabs-newtab-button
#tabs-newtab-button:hover
.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected]):hover .tab-background
.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected]):hover label
There are most probably others but it gives an idea of those that are not hard coded.
I just noticed this comment in that second css
* TODO (emilio): Once color-scheme support is complete, perhaps we can
* just replace most of these for system colors and remove all this
* duplication (assuming we honor the preferred color scheme for
* in-content privileged pages and plain-text documents). */
also, there would be others to be changed to match, like input fields background.
ah, and it’s set #333
with !important
in the first one
Nice find! Let’s hope they will make it for System colors.
I think pretty much all of those with #333 and #333333 would need to be changed for Firedragon.
Please, this time make a blue version
Facepalm. I was supposed to use userContent.css
not userChrome.css
.
:root {
--in-content-page-background: #20242c !important;
}
I generally use
yay <package_name>
or
sudo pacman -S <package_name>
Can you follow the steps in Post #1?
I told how I generally install packages , for floorp rebased firedragon , I just followed what is said in post one
And you got no errors in the terminal when issuing sudo pacman -U firedragon(etc…)?
@dr460nf1r3 do you have an idea on this installation?
That works!
So the other ones (like History page background) can also be changed by that file by the user.
Or patched by us to follow Dr460nized’s theme by default.
Thanks so much @meanruse !
Given this tends to cause issues too many times, I’m unsure whether we should part ways with this one as default setting. I stopped counting how many times this was the actual issue It would still be there in the Assistant, so…
@FGD this needs to be changed in future versions to accommodate the new home
I wonder whether the dark color of the sweet theme (the same one as the titlebar) would be a good fit should be something we can handle via patches at source code level?
This is actually quite weird! Certainly -U should install the updated files maybe pacman debug logs could provide some insight about what’s happening here? (the -v or -d flag should do)
@Ankur There is another possibility, if you are willing, it would be to purge completely all firedragon refs/folders/files and install directly v11.7.1. I had to do that once and it was like a fresh install from ISO.
Of course, backup your profile and firedragon.cfg/firedragon.overrides.cfg. Not to re-use them but in case you rollback to v119.
I apologize if this is a hijacking of the topic
I noticed that octopi has a firedragon-next 11.61.3
What about that?
A total no touch, plz. No support at all is given for Firedragon-next. It was a failed attempt.