If you read through the thread, a few other folks did run into some problems after setting up this repo. This person had trouble using some of their normal packages:
This person ran into some problems getting the kernel installed:
This person had to hack around a little bit to get the kernel working:
This person, like yourself, wound up with an un-bootable system:
As for this comment:
If you read through the posts in the thread, you’ll find quite a few community members were very happy with the results they got adding these repos and kernels to their system. Just because you used this resource and had bad results doesn’t automatically make the post problematic.
If every Arch package that gave someone problems was taken down, Arch would have nothing.
Best to leave it up to the user. Those who wish to hack around making tweaks and trying new or experimental repos and kernels have every right to do so. If you would rather not risk taking your system out of production, then your approach should be more prudent.
Not to be disagreeable, but I think it is unfair to throw garuda-update under the bus for your broken system. “A bad workman blames his tools,” as they say. 