Hits me in the feels. Ctrl-fn-super-alt, here (fn/ctrl swapped via BIOS setting, for my actual hardware), and I wouldnāt know what do with command or option. I was not looking for quite the unicorn he is, but I feel his pain. Keyoard layout, FI, I agree with him 100% on, that is a big fail Starbook (and Dell), and a big reason I have a history of Thinkpads. I had saved my last laptop, which was kind of crappy, from the landfill, and just dealt with it. When it died, I had quite a time finding one that I felt good spending money on, and no new one that I could find at the time would have fit the bill. I ended up with a Thinkpad T14 G2i, 4K, upgraded to a glass touchpad. I didnāt worry so much about long battery life, as I find 3-5 hours with light use and brightness OK (I can get over 5 hours from 90% to 20%, with a 4 year old factory battery, so Iām very pleased). The glass touchpad, which was not offered on this model when new, should have been standard. If they actually did any user testing, it probably would have been, as the plastic ones are only slightly better than what comes on the average craptop. Itās a night and day kind of improvement. High DPI adds some effort, on my part, especially on Linux, but itās worth it. I have a bit of dyslexia going on, so fonts and their rendering is a big deal, and not seeing the pixel grid is wonderful.
If there were a glass touchpad upgrade (I donāt know is there is or not), the T14 Gen 3 AMD w/ 1400P or UHD display would probably fit the guyās needs pretty wellā¦from 2022. The newer Thinkpad models donāt get near the light usage battery life of the Gen 2 and 3 AMDs. I can get over 12 hours on a T14 Gen 3 AMD w/ the 1400P panel, on Windows (work machine, so stuck with Windows). Oh, and the newer Thinkpads are making all high res displays be 300Hz OLEDs, I guess to spite customers. The tech should always be moving towards less eye strain, not more. I donāt know if they use CC or just fast PWM, but LG has been offering OLED Gram laptops with no visible flickering, in the same price range, for a few years, so thereās no technical excuse for such regressions (even if there were, it would excuse staying on IPS LCDs).
The larger x86 players want to cost-optimize themselves into mediocrity, with most of their product lines, and not build them around the users, even though they have the means. Thatās fine for $500 machines, but not $1500-3000 ones. OTOH, the smaller players canāt afford enough risk to go for excellence, as one bad product launch could doom them. Iām not a fan of many of Appleās design choices, but they get a lot done better than the industry at large.
I didnāt plan for a long rant, but I guess this isnāt the kind of thing I get a chance to vent about, very often.