Everyone is pointing at some other entity.
It is either the packaging, in which case Garuda is absolutely Arch.
And Arch would of course not answer on my report.
And if the packaging is not the cause, then it might be either related to the config or is a bug in the source code.
You seem to refuse to understand, that Garuda did fail and continues to fail, to maintain a community in a sense, that it becomes actionable and gains contributors.
Despite that, some parts of the team self admittedly say that the distro did not succeed in doing so.
So it is not possible to develop the distro as a community.
It is impossible to post about obvious distro-related issues, without having people commenting in a manner, that clearly shows that they failed to read the initial post conclusively.
It is also impossible, to find a place where someone might report an issue that is in the clear opportunity for a distro to conclude, as it is the topmost layer of the development chain.
Particularly from the perspective of a casual user.
The only thing that this community does seem to achieve, is to discourage others from contributing.
You clearly understand how to build a distro, and you clearly failed to build a community.
And to moderate one.