Why don’t we integrate CachyOS kernel by default? It gets updates quicker, has BORE scheduler, ZFS support, and many other optimizations that Zen does not have? Would there be any disadvantages to this?
I don’t know how it is now, but this kernel was not always error-free or did not work on my hardware.
So we use an all-rounder that runs stable on as many devices as possible.
If you want, you can install it later alongside the linux-zen to be on the safe side. 
7 Likes
Isnt ZFS already baken in all the kernels that basically fork the mainstream Linus kernel? AS ZFS is one of the most supported file system out there?
Its doing better, yet sometimes it can misbehave 
Hower this could be as well due to the fact I have just tooo new of a hardware configuration.
1 Like
Ok, cool
I’ve been running it for half a year at least. Haven’t run into a single issue on my hardware. I did notice some minor speed-ups here & there, but nothing that stood out very obviously.
I can’t say it’s faster, but I do like it’s smoothness (responsiveness I guess)?
These are all just
3 Likes
I’ve never felt a change in speed on old or new hardware with any of them. I’ve noticed some run hotter then others but you know what your getting into. Cachy is odd on some hardware configs mainly laptops. I haven’t seen it often but when 6.13? hit a downgrade was required for a bit which was patched, but being fast isn’t always best. When you just want to use a system normally. But you can change it all at the drop of a hat. so its no big deal. Bore and other schedulers just don’t matter to the normal user.
4 Likes